Estimating the Fiscal Reaction Function for Namibia
Journal of Economics, Management and Trade,
This paper estimates the fiscal reaction function for Namibia with the aim of establishing how the Government of Namibia responds to changes in debt levels. The VECM and the ARDL models were adopted to explore the reactions between the two variables. Both the VECM and ARDL confirmed the long-run relationship between the variables and showed that government increases its primary balance (i.e. reduce its primary deficit) by 0.07 percent and 0.31 percent, respectively, for every 1 percentage increase in debt levels. On one end, the results from VECM indicated that fiscal policy in Namibia is pro-cyclical, reflected in a positive estimated effect of the output gap on the primary balance. On the other end, the ARDL model indicated an insignificant relationship between the output gap and the primary balance. The debt targeting analysis performed provides evidence that it is not enough to only reduce the primary deficit for fiscal sustainability. Instead, it is important to grow the economy and improve the ability of debt repayment so that debt accumulation declines. Thus, the paper recommends that Namibia needs not only a positive, but also a strong economic growth if it is to make significant impacts on the debt level and guarantee both debt and fiscal sustainability.
- Fiscal reaction
- primary balance
How to Cite
Bohn H. The behavior of U.S. public debt and deficits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1998113(3):949-963.
Perrotti R. Estimating the effects of fiscal policy in OECD countries. IGIER Working Paper. 2004;276.
Mencinger J, Aristovnik A. Fiscal policy stance reaction to the financial/economic crisis in the EMU: The case of Slovenia, MPRA. 2014;62109
Stoian A, Câmpeanu E. Fiscal policy reaction in the short term for assessing fiscal sustainability in the long run in central and eastern European countries. Finance aúvěr-Czech Journal of Economics and Finance. 2010;60(6):501-518.
Barbier-Gauchard A, Mazuy N. Country-specific fiscal reaction functions: What lessons for EMU? 2018. Accessed 13 May 2019. Available:http://www.betaumr7522.fr/productions/publications/2018/2018-28.pdf
Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Finance Budget Documents; 2019. Accessed 23 April 2019. Available:www.mof.gov.na
Channdia KE, Javid AY. An analysis of debt sustainability in the economy of Pakistan. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2013;5(1):133-142.
Greiner A, Koeller U, Semmler W. Testing sustainability of German fiscal policy: Evidence for the period 1960–2003. CESifo Working Paper. 2005; 1386:1–26.
Ikikii SM. Fiscal reaction function for Kenya. Developing Economy Country Study. 2017;7(6):12-18.
Jalles JT, Afonso A. Appraising fiscal reaction functions. Working Papers; 2011. WP 23/2011/DE/UECE
Burger P, Suart I, Jooste C, Cuevas A. Fiscal sustainability and the fiscal reaction function for South Africa. IMF Working Paper; 2011.
Berti K, Colesnic E, Desponts C, Pamies S, Sail E. Fiscal reaction functions for European Union countries. European Commission Discussion Papers; 2016;028.
Luporini V. Sustainability of Brazilian fiscal policy, Once again: Corrective policy response overtime; 2005. Accessed, 21 May 2019. Available:http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ee/v45n2/0101-4161-ee-45-02-0437.pdf
Tashevska B, Trpkova-Nestorovska M Trenovski B. Estimating a fiscal reaction function for the South East European countries. Paper presented at the International Statistical Conference in Croatia, Opatija, Croatia; 2018.
İmrohoroğlu S, Sagiri K, Tomoaki Y. Fiscal sustainability in Japan: What to tackle? RIETI Discussion Paper Series. 2018;18- 064.
Vdovychenko A. Fiscal policy reaction function and sustainability of fiscal policy in Ukraine. Economic Education and Research Consortium, Working Paper. 2017;16/07
Jeong K. Analysing the effects of fiscal policy and assessing its sustainability. PhD Thesis; 2014. Accessed 2 July 2019. Available:https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/5250/2/Jeong14PhD.pdf
Bohn H. The sustainability of budget deficits with lump-sum and with income-based taxation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 1991;23(3):580-604.
Namibia: African Institute Country Survey. Namibia; 1990.
Johansen S. Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegrated vectors in Gausina VAR models. Econometrics. 1991;59(6): 1551-1580.
Enders W. Applied econometrics: Time series. Wiley. 2010;3.
Johansen S. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic, Dynamic and Control. 1988; 12(3):231-254.
Johansen S, Joselius K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration- With applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 1990;52(2).
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith R. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationship. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2001;16(3):289-326.
Rowe N. Deficit targeting Vs debt targeting; 2015. Accessed 12 August 2019. Available:https://worthwhile.typepad.com/worthwhile_canadian_initi/2015/04/deficit-trageting-vs-debt-targeting.html
Abstract View: 240 times
PDF Download: 217 times