Main Article Content
This study assessed the Effect of Sustainability Reporting on Economic Value Added of Manufacturing Firms Listed on Nigeria Stock Exchange. Twenty one (21) listed manufacturing firms constituted the sample size of this study between 2008 and 2019. Ex-Post facto research design and content analysis were adopted while secondary data were extracted from the annual reports and accounts of the sampled firms and were analysed using E-Views 10 statistical software. The study employed descriptive statistics and inferential statistics using Pearson correlation, Panel Least Square (PLS) regression analysis, granger causality test and Hausman test. Findings from the empirical analysis showed that Economic Sustainability Reporting, Social Sustainability Reporting, Environmental Sustainability Reporting and Sustainability Governance Reporting exerted a significant positive effect on Economic Value Added, of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria at 5% level of significance respectively. It was recommended inter alia that corporate entities in Nigeria should invest in sustainability activities in all its ramifications in order to boost the image/reputation of the firms thereby increasing their returns.
Elkington J. Cannibals with forks. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers; 1998.
Ball A, Grubnic S. Sustainability accounting and accountability in the public sector. In: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. & O’Dwyer (eds): Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. 2017;243-265.
Osariemen A, Edosa JA, Uwuigbe U, Olubukunola U. Audit committee attributes and audit quality: A benchmark analysis. Business: Theory and Practice; 2018.
Chen J. Economic value added (EVA); 2019. Available:https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eva.asp.
Steglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi JP. Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress; 2019. Available:http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.
Danchev A. Social capital and sustainable behavior of the firm. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2016;106(7):953- 965.
Ioannou I, Serafeim G. The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Working Paper. Harvard Business School. 2012;11-100.
Dudley CK. What is sustainability reporting; 2019. Available:https://www.rmagreen.com/rma-blog/what-is-sustainability-reporting Retrieved 24/08/2019
Swanson P, Pintér H. Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: The role of venue and industry type; Working Paper; University of Utah: Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2016.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Sustainable Development; 2010. Available:https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/47445613.pdf
Hughes A. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Acc Organ Soc. 2017;23(3):265–282.
Berger D, Gjoski IM. Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. Eur. Account. Rev. 2019;17:719–745.
Löf MW. Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strateg. Manag. J. 2018;29: 1027–1055.
GRI. Towards more and better reporting; 2018. Available:https://www.globalreporting.org/Pages/FR-ERM-2018.aspx. Retrieved 22/04/2019
Woodcraft YC. Economic and environ-mental efficiencies based on material flow analysis and data envelopment analysis: A case study of Liaoning province. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2012;35(11):3797.
Corsini DC, Moultrie TC. The research for Liaoning environmental efficiency and spatial-temporal differentiation. Geogra-phical Research. 2019;33(12):2345-2357.
Amahalu NN, Ezechukwu BO, Obi JC. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of quoted deposit money banks in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Science and Technology. 2018;08(12): 7183-7191.
Chery KL. Elucidating the relationship between sustainability reporting and organisational change management for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2019;125: 168–188.
Fortes UN. Is corporate reputation associated with quality of CSR reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manag. 2012;24:121–132.
Mclaughlin RW. Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Acad. Manag. J. 2019;44: 697–713.
Kent P, Chan C. Application of stakeholder theory to corporate environmental disclosures. Corp. Owners Control. 2019;7: 394–410.
Moore K, Moore J. Corporate social responsibility: The link between sustainability disclosure and sustainability performance. Abacus. 2019;50:422–459.
Shad MK, Lai FW, Fatt CL, Klemes JJ, Bokhari A. Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2019;208:415–425.
Bakker HL. An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. J. Intern. Fin. Manag. Account. 2019;18:123–150.
Abela MS. Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective–A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2019;22”1–35.
Freijo A. Critical review of social and environmental accounting research. Crit. Perspect. Account. 2019;21:76– 89.
Sial M, Zheng C, Khuong N, Khan T, Usman M. Does firm performance influence corporate social responsibility reporting of Chinese listed companies? Sustainability. 2018;10:2217.
Nathan FH. Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. J. Bus. Ethics. 2019;96:435–451.
Stewart GB. Best-practice EVA. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
Dheeraj V. Economic value added; 2019. Available:https://www.wallstreetmojo.com/economic-value-added-eva/. Retrieved 11/09/2019
Lodhia S, Hess N. Sustainability accounting and reporting in the mining industry: Current literature and directions for future research. J. Clean. Prod. 2014; 84:43–50.
Melloni G, Caglio A, Perego P. Saying more with less? Disclosure conciseness, completeness and balance in integrated reports. J. Account. Public Policy. 2017;36: 220–238.
Chen L, Tang O, Feldmann A. Applying GRI reports for the investigation of environmental management practices and company performance in Sweden, China and India. J. Clean. Prod. 2015;98:36–46.
Ma Y, Zhang Q, Yin Q, Wang B. The influence of top managers on environmental information disclosure: The moderating effect of company’s environ-mental performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:1167.
Meng X, Zeng S, Xie X, Zou H. Beyond symbolic and substantive: Strategic disclosure of corporate environmental information in China. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2019;28:403–417.
Plumlee M, Brown D, Hayes RM, Marshall RS. Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. J. Account. Public Policy. 2015;34:336– 361.
Hassan OA, Romilly P. Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2018;27:893–909.
Xu S, Liu D. Do financial markets care about corporate social responsibility disclosure? Further evidence from China. Aust. Account. Rev. 2018;28:79–103.
Cormier D, Magnan M. The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on corporate legitimacy: An empirical investigation. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2015;24:431–450.
Fazzini M, Dal, Maso L. The value relevance of “assured” environmental disclosure: The Italian experience. Sus. Account. Manag. Policy J. 2016;7:225–245.
Testa F, Miroshnychenko I, Barontini R, Frey M. Does it pay to be a green washer or a brownwasher? Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2018;27:1104–1116.
Cho CH, Michelon G, Patten DM, Roberts RW. CSR disclosure: The more things change? Account. Audit. Accoun. 2015;28: 14–35.
Radhouane I, Nekhili Shad MK, Lai FW, Fatt CL, Klemes JJ, Bokhari A. Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;208:415–425.
Qiu Y, Shaukat A, Tharyan R. Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. Br. Account. Rev. 2016;48:102–116.
Li D, Zhao Y, Sun Y, Yin D. Corporate environmental performance, environmental information disclosure, and financial performance: Evidence from China. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2017;23:323–339.
Ghisetti C, Rennings K. Environmental innovations and profitability: How does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey. J. Clean. Prod. 2014;75:106–117.
Ma Y, Hou G, Xin B. Green process innovation and innovation benefit: The mediating effect of firm image. Sustainability. 2017;9:1778.
Wang X, Sun C, Wang S. Going green or going away? A spatial empirical examination of the relationship between environmental regulations, biased techno-logical progress and green total factor productivity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:1917.
Benlemlih M, Shaukat A, Qiu Y, Trojanowski G. Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. J. Bus. Ethics. 2018;152:613–626.
Masud M, Hossain M, Kim J. Is green regulation effective or a failure: comparative analysis between Bangladesh Bank (BB) green guidelines and global reporting initiative guidelines. Sustainability. 2018;10:1267.
Mahmood Z, Kouser R, Ali W, Ahmad Z, Salman T. Does corporate governance affect sustainability disclosure? A mixed methods study. Sustainability. 2018;10: 207.
Hasan I, Kobeissi N, Liu L, Wang H. Corporate social responsibility and firmfinancial performance: The mediating role of productivity. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018;149(3):671-688.
Emeka-Nwokeji NA, Osisioma BC. Sustainability disclosures and market value of firms in emerging economy: Evidence from Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research. 2019;7(3):1-19.
Guerrero-Villegas J, Pérez-Calero L, Hurtado-González J, Giráldez-Puig P. Board attributes and corporate social responsibility disclosure: A meta-analysis. Sustainability. 2018;10:4808.
Chan A, Unger J. Corporatism in China: A developmental state in an East Asian context. In China after socialism: In the footsteps of Eastern Europe or East Asia; Routledge: Abingdon, UK. 2017;95–129.
Li S, Tan HY, Wang N, Cheung F, Hong M, Feng Y. The potential and action mechanism of polyphenols in the treatment of liver diseases. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018;2(8):127-136.
Zhang Y, Weng Q, Zhu N. The relationships between electronic banking adoption and its antecedents: A meta-analytic study of the role of national culture. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018;40:76–87.
Hamrouni A, Miloudi A, Benkraiem R. Signaling firm performance through corporate voluntary disclosure. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 2015;31:609–620.
Forte LM, Neto JB, Nobre FC, Nobre LH, Queiroz DB. Determinants of voluntary disclosure: A study in the Brazilian baking sector. Rev. Gest. Financ. Contab. 2015;5: 23–37.
He P, Hou ZL, Wang CY, Li ZJ, Jing J, Bi S. Mutual promotion effect co-substitution on structure and multiferroic properties of BiFeO3 ceramic. Ceram. Int. 2017;43:262–267.
Platonova E, Asutay M, Dixon R, Mohammad S. The impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on financial performance: Evidence from the GCC Islamic banking sector. J. Bus. Ethics. 2018;151:451–471.
Yao S, Liang H. Analyst following, environmental disclosure and cost of equity: Research based on industry classification. Sustainability. 2019;11:300.
Ismagilova E, Slade E, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK. The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019; 13(5):48-55.
Eisend M. Morality effects and consumer responses to counterfeit and pirated products: A meta-analysis. J. Bus. Ethics. 2019;154:301–323.
Freeman RE. Strategic management: A stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman; 1984.
Friedman AL, Miles S. Stakeholders: theory and practice. Oxford University Press; 2006.
Freeman RE. A stakeholder theory of modern corporations. Ethical Theory and Business, 7th edn; 2004.
Elif AS. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The moderating role of ownership concentration in Turkey. Sustainability. 2019;11(3643):1-10.
Chih-Yun Y, Yang CH. The impact of sustainable environmental management in the food and beverage industry on customer loyalty: A view of brand attitude. Ekoloji. 2019;107:965-972.